Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Watch Live

Public Safety

Trial ordered for National City teacher accused of sex crimes involving minors

Jacqueline Ma appearing in court via video conference at her arraignment hearing on March 13, 2023.
KGTV
Jacqueline Ma appearing in court via video conference at her arraignment hearing on March 13, 2023.

Editor's note: This story contains details that some readers may find disturbing.

A Lincoln Acres Elementary School teacher was ordered Tuesday to stand trial on 18 felony sex crime charges for alleged sexual misconduct involving two minors.

Jacqueline Ma, 34, who was named one of San Diego County's 2022 "teachers of the year," is accused of grooming two boys and entering into a sexual relationship with one of the boys beginning when he was 12 years old.

Among the charges Ma faces are felony counts of lewd acts on a child, contacting a minor with the intent to commit a sexual offense, and possession of child pornography.

Advertisement

She faces up to 165 years to life in state prison if convicted of all charges.

Ma was initially arrested in March and remains in jail without bail.

At a preliminary hearing held in Chula Vista Superior Court, National City police Detective Colleen Stanich, the lead detective on the case, testified that police were first alerted by the mother of one of the alleged victims, who was referred to in court as John Doe 1.

John Doe 1 testified in court on Tuesday, but reporters and members of the public were not permitted to hear his testimony in order to protect his privacy.

Stanich testified that in March, John Doe 1's mother told police she found messages on a tablet between her son and Ma, in which Ma directed the boy to delete some of the messages or to communicate with her in "vanish mode" so the messages would eventually disappear.

Advertisement

The detective said she later spoke with Ma about her connection to the boy and Ma allegedly told her, "It's complicated and I may have blurred the lines."

A subsequent search of Ma's cell phone turned up numerous text messages within a hidden application.

Many of those messages were read in court and described sex acts between Ma and the boy, while others included explicit photographs of John Doe 1, Stanich testified. In other messages, Ma described being in love with John Doe 1 and being saddened that their relationship would not last and he would eventually start dating girls his own age.

Ma was initially charged solely in connection with John Doe 1, but in July, prosecutors added additional charges regarding a second boy, referred to as John Doe 2.

At the preliminary hearing, prosecutors alleged Ma exchanged a series of sexually charged text messages with John Doe 2 starting when he was 11.

John Doe 2 allegedly told police that he and Ma had devised a "plan" for him to meet with her in her classroom, Stanich testified. When he entered the classroom, Ma allegedly took off her shirt and "tried to get close to him," but the boy left the classroom because he was afraid, the detective said.

Stanich testified that Ma groomed both boys by buying them gifts, including clothes and gaming-related items.

While prosecutors elected to dismiss one of the counts Ma was originally facing, they requested that several of the counts be amended to reflect that the alleged acts were committed while the victim was under duress.

Ma's defense attorney, Mario Vela, argued against those amended counts, saying duress should involve some level of physical force or threats, while Deputy District Attorney Drew Hart said Ma's position as a teacher and an authority figure placed pressure upon the victims.

Superior Court Judge Maryann D'Addezio agreed with the prosecution's request, stating "The evidence is overwhelmingly clear that the defendant took advantage of two children." In regards to John Doe 1, D'Addezio said Ma "used her authority ... to coerce him into behaviors that he wasn't ready for, for a relationship that was beyond appropriate, beyond wrong."

KPBS has created a public safety coverage policy to guide decisions on what stories we prioritize, as well as whose narratives we need to include to tell complete stories that best serve our audiences. This policy was shaped through months of training with the Poynter Institute and feedback from the community. You can read the full policy here.